=== on 8 Oct 2014, 19:12:56 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] after writing this rule up, I noticed that its analog is commented-out:

        /**

* Since you can change the number of core threads for a scheduled
* thread pool executor, disabling this for now
         *

So... what do you think of a smarter implementation (I'd have to update the description) that detects when it's set to zero & left that way?

=== on 21 Oct 2014, 15:47:15 Nicolas Peru wrote:
This is way harder. The "left that way" part can concern a lot of code not under analysis scope.

=== on 21 Oct 2014, 20:01:32 Ann Campbell wrote:
Do you feel the rule has value as-is or should we scrap it as was done in FB?

=== on 4 Feb 2015, 08:59:04 Nicolas Peru wrote:
Let's reimplement it as what was done in FB. Scheduled for 3.0.

