=== on 16 Aug 2016, 18:06:27 Alban Auzeill wrote:
I close this rule in favor of [RSPEC-3696] that mark as non-compliant NULL and 0 (zero).

=== on 16 Aug 2016, 19:28:50 Ann Campbell wrote:
As an addendum to the previous comment: ``++NULL++`` evaluates to 0, so we can't distinguish between ``++throw NULL++`` and ``++throw 0++``.

