Even though this is syntactically correct, the ``++void++`` return type should not be used in the signature of a constructor. Indeed some developers might be confused by this syntax, believing that the constructor is in fact a standard function. 


== Noncompliant Code Example

----
public class Foo   
{
  public function Foo() : void
  {...}      
}
----


== Compliant Solution

----
public class Foo   
{
  public function Foo()
  {...}      
}
----


ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]
