=== on 2 Dec 2014, 09:45:21 Pierre-Yves Nicolas wrote:
The rule title may be misleading. If a loop uses an initialization or condition which is not hard-coded, the fact that the invariant is not true at least once may be normal. What about "Loop invariants should not be always false"?

=== on 2 Dec 2014, 14:46:52 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~pierre-yves.nicolas] this is partly why I want to ignore loops with non-hard-coded initializations or conditions.


To me the 2 title versions are six-of-one-half-dozen-of-the-other. But given that we'd ignore non-hard-coded, do you still care?

=== on 2 Dec 2014, 15:02:37 Pierre-Yves Nicolas wrote:
No, I don't care much.

