rspec/rules/S1104/comments-and-links.adoc

=== relates to: S2357

=== replaces: S1251

=== on 3 Jul 2013, 10:53:33 Freddy Mallet wrote:
Is implemented by \http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARJAVA-188.

=== on 9 Jul 2013, 06:13:33 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:
\[~fabrice.bellingard] Class members also include methods, which can make the title misleading.

=== on 16 Nov 2020, 12:19:23 Andrei Epure wrote:
\[~nicolas.harraudeau] there is an overlap between RSPEC-2357 ... given it doesn't make sense for both to be enabled, what could we do - deprecate  RSPEC-2357 in favor of this one? or am I missing something?

=== on 16 Nov 2020, 14:37:29 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:
\[~andrei.epure] Indeed, from a specification point of view there are only minor difference between these two rules. Deprecating RSPEC-2357, which is not in sonar way, in favor of RSPEC-1104 is a good idea IMHO.


Could you just check if the implementations differ in any significant way? I don't see how we got two implementations of the same rule.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== relates to: S2357`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== replaces: S1251`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 3 Jul 2013, 10:53:33 Freddy Mallet wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Is implemented by \http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARJAVA-188.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 9 Jul 2013, 06:13:33 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~fabrice.bellingard] Class members also include methods, which can make the title misleading.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 16 Nov 2020, 12:19:23 Andrei Epure wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~nicolas.harraudeau] there is an overlap between RSPEC-2357 ... given it doesn't make sense for both to be enabled, what could we do - deprecate RSPEC-2357 in favor of this one? or am I missing something?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 16 Nov 2020, 14:37:29 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~andrei.epure] Indeed, from a specification point of view there are only minor difference between these two rules. Deprecating RSPEC-2357, which is not in sonar way, in favor of RSPEC-1104 is a good idea IMHO.`


			`Could you just check if the implementations differ in any significant way? I don't see how we got two implementations of the same rule.`