rspec/rules/S1573/comments-and-links.adoc

=== replaces: S1480

=== on 20 Mar 2015, 18:32:46 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~freddy.mallet], it's not clear to me from the description if you're trying to re-open the cursor before or after it has been closed implicitly. Or does the timing matter?

=== on 2 Mar 2017, 17:42:58 Pierre-Yves Nicolas wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] What should be the issue message for this rule? The message of the current COBOL implementation is "Cursor X is never closed."

=== on 2 Mar 2017, 17:44:28 Ann Campbell wrote:
Message added [~pierre-yves.nicolas]
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== replaces: S1480`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 20 Mar 2015, 18:32:46 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~freddy.mallet], it's not clear to me from the description if you're trying to re-open the cursor before or after it has been closed implicitly. Or does the timing matter?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 2 Mar 2017, 17:42:58 Pierre-Yves Nicolas wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] What should be the issue message for this rule? The message of the current COBOL implementation is "Cursor X is never closed."`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 2 Mar 2017, 17:44:28 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Message added [~pierre-yves.nicolas]`