rspec/rules/S1515/comments-and-links.adoc

=== is related to: S3044

=== on 21 Apr 2017, 14:49:45 Elena Vilchik wrote:
\[~jeanchristophe.collet] Could you please update message for this rule? Something like "Review this function declated inside loop and make sure it is not called after loop ends and it doesn't depend on variables updated with each iteration." (\https://github.com/SonarSource/sonar-javascript/issues/573)

=== on 16 Feb 2018, 10:42:58 Elena Vilchik wrote:
Function declared inside is a problem when using ``++var++`` declaration for counter. This is very unlikely that in TS somebody will use ``++var++``. So this rule will have very low ROI. So we will not implement it for TS.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is related to: S3044`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 21 Apr 2017, 14:49:45 Elena Vilchik wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~jeanchristophe.collet] Could you please update message for this rule? Something like "Review this function declated inside loop and make sure it is not called after loop ends and it doesn't depend on variables updated with each iteration." (\https://github.com/SonarSource/sonar-javascript/issues/573)`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 16 Feb 2018, 10:42:58 Elena Vilchik wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			Function declared inside is a problem when using ``++var++`` declaration for counter. This is very unlikely that in TS somebody will use ``++var++``. So this rule will have very low ROI. So we will not implement it for TS.