rspec/rules/S2959/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

The semicolon (``++;++``) is optional as a statement separator except in traditional ``++for++`` loops and when several statements are combined on one line (which is a bad practice). For cleaner code, semicolons should be omitted.


=== Noncompliant code example

[source,text]
----
int a;  // Noncompliant
----


=== Compliant solution

[source,text]
----
int a
----
migrate rule descriptions to new education format 2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00			`== Why is this an issue?`

Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940) Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once. Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information on what language the code is written in. 2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00			The semicolon (``++;++``) is optional as a statement separator except in traditional ``++for++`` loops and when several statements are combined on one line (which is a bad practice). For cleaner code, semicolons should be omitted.
Add rules 2000-2999 2020-06-30 12:48:07 +02:00

Inline adoc when include has no additional value (#1940) Inline adoc files when they are included exactly once. Also fix language tags because this inlining gives us better information on what language the code is written in. 2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00			`=== Noncompliant code example`

			`[source,text]`
			`----`
			`int a; // Noncompliant`
			`----`


			`=== Compliant solution`

			`[source,text]`
			`----`
			`int a`
			`----`