rspec/rules/S4025/vbnet/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

include::../description.adoc[]

=== Noncompliant code example

[source,vbnet]
----
Public Class Fruit

    Protected PlantingSeason As String

    ' ...

End Class

Public Class Raspberry
    Inherits Fruit

    Protected Plantingseason As String  ' Noncompliant

    ' ...

End Class
----

=== Compliant solution

[source,vbnet]
----
Public Class Fruit

    Protected PlantingSeason As String

    ' ...

End Class

Public Class Raspberry
    Inherits Fruit

    Protected WhenToPlant As String

    ' ...

End Class
----
Or

[source,vbnet]
----
Public Class Fruit

    Protected PlantingSeason As String

    ' ...

End Class

Public Class Raspberry
    Inherits Fruit

    ' Field removed, parent field will be used instead

End Class
----

=== Exceptions

This rule ignores same-name fields that are ``++Shared++`` in both the parent and child classes. It also ignores ``++Private++`` parent class fields and fields explicitly declared as ``++Shadows++``, but in all other such cases, the child class field should be renamed.

ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::../message.adoc[]

include::../highlighting.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]