rspec/rules/S7425/rust/rule.adoc

29 lines
886 B
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Normal View History

== Why is this an issue?
Using ``++MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init()++`` results in undefined behavior for most types, since it bypasses initialization and assumes the data is valid. This can lead to unpredictable results and hard-to-diagnose bugs.
=== Code examples
==== Noncompliant code example
[source,rust,diff-id=1,diff-type=noncompliant]
----
use std::mem::MaybeUninit;
let _: usize = unsafe { MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init() }; // Noncompliant: Unsafe code resulting in undefined behavior.
----
==== Compliant solution
[source,rust,diff-id=1,diff-type=compliant]
----
use std::mem::MaybeUninit;
let _: [MaybeUninit<bool>; 5] = unsafe { MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init() }; // Compliant: Allowed for tuples/arrays of MaybeUninit.
----
== Resources
=== Documentation
* Clippy Lints - https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninit_assumed_init