rspec/rules/S1186/comments-and-links.adoc

=== relates to: S3575

=== relates to: S3050

=== is related to: S108

=== on 7 Aug 2013, 17:12:31 Freddy Mallet wrote:
Is implemented by \http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARJAVA-273

=== on 26 Aug 2013, 14:33:16 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:
As discussed, this rule should no longer apply to abstract classes to allow default visitor implementations for example
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== relates to: S3575`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== relates to: S3050`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is related to: S108`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 7 Aug 2013, 17:12:31 Freddy Mallet wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Is implemented by \http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONARJAVA-273`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 26 Aug 2013, 14:33:16 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`As discussed, this rule should no longer apply to abstract classes to allow default visitor implementations for example`