rspec/rules/S905/comments-and-links.adoc

=== deprecates: S1875

=== deprecates: S2848

=== deprecates: S2998

=== relates to: S1848

=== is related to: S1763

=== relates to: S901

=== on 21 Oct 2014, 20:06:34 Ann Campbell wrote:
Uhm... I think this rule simply mandates that S/RSPEC-901 be included in any SonarQube analysis.

=== on 21 Oct 2014, 20:07:13 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~samuel.mercier] this probably deserves an "unused" tag

=== on 15 Jul 2016, 14:19:35 Ann Campbell wrote:
https://github.com/google/error-prone/blob/master/docs/bugpattern/UnusedAnonymousClass.md

=== on 10 Mar 2017, 09:09:33 Elena Vilchik wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Can we update the message to explain why statement is wrong? E.g. ``++Remove or refactor this statement. It has no side-effect.++``

=== on 10 Mar 2017, 14:01:48 Ann Campbell wrote:
Absolutely [~elena.vilchik]! Done.

=== on 16 Oct 2018, 11:01:51 Alexandre Gigleux wrote:
Irrelevant for Java. Better covered by RSPEC-2246

=== on 24 Sep 2019, 16:34:02 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:
Irrelevant for C#.

Example: When adding ``++1 == 1++`` in a method, the compilation fails with the following error message: "Only assignment, call, increment, decrement, await, and new object expressions can be used as a statement"


It is also better covered by RSPEC-3448
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== deprecates: S1875`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== deprecates: S2848`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== deprecates: S2998`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== relates to: S1848`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is related to: S1763`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== relates to: S901`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 21 Oct 2014, 20:06:34 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Uhm... I think this rule simply mandates that S/RSPEC-901 be included in any SonarQube analysis.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 21 Oct 2014, 20:07:13 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~samuel.mercier] this probably deserves an "unused" tag`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 15 Jul 2016, 14:19:35 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`https://github.com/google/error-prone/blob/master/docs/bugpattern/UnusedAnonymousClass.md`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 10 Mar 2017, 09:09:33 Elena Vilchik wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			\[~ann.campbell.2] Can we update the message to explain why statement is wrong? E.g. ``++Remove or refactor this statement. It has no side-effect.++``

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 10 Mar 2017, 14:01:48 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Absolutely [~elena.vilchik]! Done.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 16 Oct 2018, 11:01:51 Alexandre Gigleux wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Irrelevant for Java. Better covered by RSPEC-2246`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 24 Sep 2019, 16:34:02 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Irrelevant for C#.`

			Example: When adding ``++1 == 1++`` in a method, the compilation fails with the following error message: "Only assignment, call, increment, decrement, await, and new object expressions can be used as a statement"


			`It is also better covered by RSPEC-3448`