rspec/rules/S1120/java/rule.adoc

include::../introduction.adoc[]

== Why is this an issue?

include::../why.adoc[]

=== What is the potential impact?

include::../impact.adoc[]

== How to fix it

include::../how-to-fix.adoc[]

=== Code examples

==== Noncompliant code example

With an indent size of 2:

[source,java,diff-id=1,diff-type=noncompliant]
----
class Foo {
  public int a;
   public int b;   // Noncompliant, expected to start at column 4

...

  public void doSomething() {
    if(something) {
          doSomethingElse();  // Noncompliant, expected to start at column 6
  }   // Noncompliant, expected to start at column 4
  }
}
----

==== Compliant solution

[source,java,diff-id=1,diff-type=compliant]
----
class Foo {
  public int a;
  public int b;

...

  public void doSomething() {
    if(something) {
      doSomethingElse();
    }
  }
}
----

=== Going the extra mile

include::../extra-mile.adoc[]

== Resources

=== External coding guidelines

* https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html[Google Java Style Guide]

ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::../message.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 18 Nov 2016, 08:38:56 Tibor Blenessy wrote:
The parameter key is called ``++indentationLevel++`` in the current implementation. Changing the key would be a breaking change, so I am changing the RSPEC to match the implementation.

include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]