rspec/rules/S1185/csharp/rule.adoc

Overriding a method just to call the same method from the base class without performing any other actions is useless and misleading. The only time this is justified is in ``++sealed++`` overriding methods, where the effect is to lock in the parent class behavior. This rule ignores overrides of ``++Equals++`` and ``++GetHashCode++``.


NOTE++:++ In some cases it might be dangerous to add or remove empty overrides, as they might be breaking changes.

== Noncompliant Code Example

----
public override void Method() // Noncompliant
{
  base.Method(); 
}
----

== Compliant Solution

----
public override void Method()
{
  //do something else
}
----

== Exceptions

If there is an attribute in any level of the overriding chain, then the overridden member is ignored.


----
public class Base
{
  [Required]
  public virtual string Name { get; set; }
}

public class Derived : Base
{
  public override string Name
  {
    get 
    { 
      return base.Name; 
    }
    set 
    { 
      base.Name = value; 
    }
  }
}
----

If there is a documentation comment on the overriding method, it will be ignored:


----
public class Foo : Bar
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Keep this method for backwards compatibility.
    /// </summary>
    public override void DoSomething()
    {
        base.DoSomething();
    }
}
----

ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::message.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]