rspec/rules/S1858/csharp/rule.adoc

Invoking a method designed to return a string representation of an object which is already a string is a waste of keystrokes. Similarly, explicitly invoking ``++ToString()++`` when the compiler would do it implicitly is also needless code-bloat.


This rule raises an issue when ``++ToString()++`` is invoked:

* on a ``++string++``
* on a non-``++string++`` operand to concatenation
* on an argument to ``++string.Format++``

== Noncompliant Code Example

----
var s = "foo";
var t = "fee fie foe " + s.ToString();  // Noncompliant
var someObject = new object();
var u = "" + someObject.ToString(); // Noncompliant
var v = string.Format("{0}", someObject.ToString()); // Noncompliant
----

== Compliant Solution

----
var s = "foo";
var t = "fee fie foe " + s;
var someObject = new object();
var u = "" + someObject;
var v = string.Format("{0}", someObject);
----

== Exceptions

The rule does not report on value types, where leaving off the ``++ToString()++`` call would result in automatic boxing.

----
var v = string.Format("{0}", 1.ToString());
----