rspec/rules/S5326/java/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 2 Apr 2019, 11:37:57 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:
We could define a vulnerability rule as many projects on Github have just ``++handler.proceed();++`` in ``++onReceivedSslError++``. But the usefulness of such a rule might be limited as it seems that https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7071387?hl=en[Google validates the plugins]. We should first check if Google is able to detect every simple case.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 2 Apr 2019, 11:37:57 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			We could define a vulnerability rule as many projects on Github have just ``++handler.proceed();++`` in ``++onReceivedSslError++``. But the usefulness of such a rule might be limited as it seems that https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7071387?hl=en[Google validates the plugins]. We should first check if Google is able to detect every simple case.