2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
=== on 2 May 2014, 15:26:27 Massimo PALADIN wrote:
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
@ann are you sure about ``++[ \t]++``? I don't really like tab characters on source code. Also, are sure about ``++*++``? Wouldn't it be better ``++?++``.
IMHO the following is not really nice:
----
// TODO (author) should be done
----
I would propose:
----
[ ]?\([ _a-zA-Z0-9@.]+\)
----
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
=== on 2 May 2014, 15:33:33 Ann Campbell wrote:
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
\[~massimo.paladin] I buy your argument on the tab char but would like to allow multiple spaces, so let's compromise on
----
[ ]*\([ _a-zA-Z0-9@.]+\)
----
