A ``++Catch++`` clause that only rethrows the caught exception has the same effect as omitting the ``++Catch++`` altogether and letting it bubble up automatically, but with more code and the additional detriment of leaving maintainers scratching their heads.
This rule will not generate issues for ``++Catch++`` blocks with just ``++Throw++`` inside if they are followed by a ``++Catch++`` block for a more general exception type that does more than just rethrowing the exception.