rspec/rules/S5905/python/rule.adoc

65 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

== Why is this an issue?
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
Using the ``++assert++`` statement on a tuple literal will always fail if the tuple is empty, and always succeed otherwise.
The ``++assert++`` statement does not have parentheses around its parameters. Calling ``++assert(x, y)++`` will test if the tuple ``++(x, y)++`` is True, which is always the case.
There are two possible fixes:
* If your intention is to test the first value of the tuple and use the second value as a message, simply remove the parentheses.
* If your intention is to check that every element of the tuple is ``++True++``, test each value separately.
=== Noncompliant code example
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,python]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
def test_values(a, b):
assert (a, b) # Noncompliant
----
=== Compliant solution
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,python]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
def test_values(a, b):
# If you mean to test "a" and use "b" as an error message
assert a, b
# If you mean to test the values of "a" and "b"
assert a and b
----
== Resources
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
* https://docs.python.org/3/reference/simple_stmts.html#the-assert-statement[Python documentation - The ``++assert++`` statement]
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Fix this assertion on a tuple literal; did you mean "assert A, B".
=== Highlighting
The tuple parameter
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
=== deprecates: S1721
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]