rspec/rules/S3262/csharp/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

Overriding methods automatically inherit the ``++params++`` behavior. To ease readability, this modifier should be explicitly used in the overriding method as well.


=== Noncompliant code example

[source,csharp]
----
class Base
{
  public virtual void Method(params int[] numbers)
  {
    ...
  }
}
class Derived : Base
{
  public override void Method(int[] numbers) // Noncompliant, the params is missing.
  {
    ...
  }
}
----


=== Compliant solution

[source,csharp]
----
class Base
{
  public virtual void Method(params int[] numbers)
  {
    ...
  }
}
class Derived : Base
{
  public override void Method(params int[] numbers)
  {
    ...
  }
}
----


ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

=== Message

"params" should not be removed from an override.


'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 20 Jul 2015, 12:04:05 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I removed all "superclass" strings from the description.

=== on 20 Jul 2015, 14:35:17 Ann Campbell wrote:
thanks [~tamas.vajk]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]