2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
|
|
|
=== on 6 Mar 2017, 17:55:59 Amaury Levé wrote:
|
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
|
|
|
\[~freddy.mallet] Shall we ignore all empty methods or only public ones? If you say all of them, shall we also ignore empty Ctor?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
About ``++static void Main(string[] args)++`` do you mean we also ignore the argument even if the method is not empty?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
|
|
|
=== on 7 Mar 2017, 10:08:34 Jean-Christophe Collet wrote:
|
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
|
|
|
My suggestions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Ignore all empty methods including constructors (they should be flagged by another issue anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
* Yes, since Main(string[] args) is a 'non-negotiable' signature, we should ignore the case where 'args' is not used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
|
|
|
=== on 7 Jan 2019, 16:44:49 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:
|
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
|
|
|
The new description matches the existing implementation. It just explains more precisely what cases raise an issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
|
