rspec/rules/S2091/comments-and-links.adoc

=== relates to: S4817

=== on 8 Oct 2014, 07:27:39 Nicolas Peru wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2]Ok with this rule, but I think that during implementation on Java, the checked API should be precised in the description.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== relates to: S4817`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 8 Oct 2014, 07:27:39 Nicolas Peru wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2]Ok with this rule, but I think that during implementation on Java, the checked API should be precised in the description.`