rspec/rules/S1552/cobol/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

The ``++TRANSFORM++`` statement is only supported by OS/VS COBOL, and should be replaced by the ``++INSPECT CONVERTING++`` statement to prevent portability issues.
migrate rule descriptions to new education format 2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00			`== Why is this an issue?`

Restructure one-lang rspecs 2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00			The ``++TRANSFORM++`` statement is only supported by OS/VS COBOL, and should be replaced by the ``++INSPECT CONVERTING++`` statement to prevent portability issues.
Fix the missing default metadata fields 2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00