36 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
36 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
![]() |
Having two branches in the same <code>if</code> structure with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then they should be combined.
|
||
|
|
||
|
== Noncompliant Code Example
|
||
|
|
||
|
----
|
||
|
if 0 <= a < 10:
|
||
|
do_first()
|
||
|
do_second()
|
||
|
elif 10 <= a < 20:
|
||
|
do_the_other_thing()
|
||
|
elif 20 <= a < 50:
|
||
|
do_first() # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition
|
||
|
do_second()
|
||
|
----
|
||
|
|
||
|
== Exceptions
|
||
|
|
||
|
Blocks in an <code>if</code> chain that contain a single line of code are ignored.
|
||
|
|
||
|
----
|
||
|
if 0 <= a < 10:
|
||
|
do_first()
|
||
|
elif 10 <= a < 20:
|
||
|
do_the_other_thing()
|
||
|
elif 20 <= a < 50:
|
||
|
do_first() # no issue, usually this is done on purpose to increase the readability
|
||
|
----
|
||
|
|
||
|
But this exception does not apply to <code>if</code> chains without <code>else</code>-s when all branches have the same single line of code. In case of <code>if</code> chains with <code>else</code>-s rule S3923 raises a bug.
|
||
|
----
|
||
|
if 0 <= a < 10:
|
||
|
do_first()
|
||
|
elif 20 <= a < 50:
|
||
|
do_first() # Noncompliant, this might have been done on purpose but probably not
|
||
|
----
|