rspec/rules/S1871/ruby/rule.adoc

54 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2020-06-30 12:47:33 +02:00
Having two <code>when</code> clauses in a <code>case</code> statement or two branches in an <code>if</code> chain with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then in an <code>if</code> chain they should be combined, or for a <code>case</code>, duplicates should be refactored.
== Noncompliant Code Example
----
case i
when 1
doFirstThing()
doSomething()
when 2
doSomethingDifferent()
when 3 # Noncompliant; duplicates case 1's implementation
doFirstThing()
doSomething()
else
doTheRest()
end
if a >= 0 && a < 10
doFirstThing()
doTheThing()
elsif a >= 10 && a < 20
doTheOtherThing()
elsif a >= 20 && a < 50
doFirstThing()
doTheThing() # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition
else
doTheRest()
end
----
== Exceptions
Blocks in an <code>if</code> chain that contain a single line of code are ignored, as are blocks in a <code>case</code> statement that contain a single line of code.
----
if a ==
doSomething() # no issue, usually this is done on purpose to increase the readability
elsif a == 2
doSomethingElse()
else
doSomething()
end
----
But this exception does not apply to <code>if</code> chains without <code>else</code>-s, or to <code>case</code>-es without <code>else</code> clauses when all branches have the same single line of code. In case of <code>if</code> chains with <code>else</code>-s, or of <code>case</code>-es with <code>else</code> clauses, rule S3923 raises a bug.
----
if a == 1
doSomething() # Noncompliant, this might have been done on purpose but probably not
elsif a == 2
doSomething()
end
----