2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
=== relates to: S1304
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
=== on 9 Oct 2013, 00:11:19 Ann Campbell wrote:
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
The Noncompliant example for this one embeds the compliant examples. Is this sufficient, or should they be split out? Should I be adding a compliant copy of the example?
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
=== on 10 Oct 2013, 08:51:16 Freddy Mallet wrote:
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
I've updated the code the description [~ann.campbell.2]
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
=== on 11 Nov 2013, 12:55:03 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
I didn't get the double negation part of the title, "Sections should not be left undocumented".
I think "Sections should be documented" is much better.
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
=== on 13 Nov 2013, 12:06:27 Ann Campbell wrote:
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Agreed, [~dinesh.bolkensteyn]
