rspec/rules/S5428/python/rule.adoc

29 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
A common anti-pattern is to check that a key does not exist in a dictionary before adding it with a corresponding value. This pattern works but is less readable than the equivalent call to the built-in dictionary method "setdefault()".
Note that if a default value is set for every key of the dictionary it is possible to use python's ``++defaultdict++`` instead.
This rule raises an issue when a key presence is checked before being set. It only raises an issue when the value is a hard-coded string, number, list, dictionary or tuple. Computed values will not raise an issue as they can have side-effects.
== Noncompliant Code Example
----
if "key" not in my_dictionary:
my_dictionary["key"] = ["a", "b", "c"] # Noncompliant
if "key" not in my_dictionary:
my_dictionary["key"] = generate_value() # Compliant. No issue is raised as generate_value() might have some side-effect.
----
== Compliant Solution
----
my_dictionary.setdefault("key", ["a", "b", "c"])
# OR, if ["a", "b", "c"] is the default value for every key
from collections import defaultdict
my_dictionary = defaultdict(lambda: ["a", "b", "c"])
----