rspec/rules/S3371/java/rule.adoc

40 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

``++PreparedStatement++``s and ``++CallableStatement++``s (for stored procedures) are safer and more efficient than ``++Statement++``s and should always be preferred.
This rule raises an issue each time a ``++Statement++`` is declared.
== Noncompliant Code Example
----
Statement stmt = null; // Noncompliant
// ...
----
== Compliant Solution
----
PreparedStatement stmt = null;
// ...
----
== See
2021-10-28 10:07:16 +02:00
* https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html[MITRE, CWE-89] - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command
* https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/564.html[MITRE, CWE-564] - SQL Injection: Hibernate
* https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html[MITRE, CWE-20] - Improper Input Validation
* https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/943.html[MITRE, CWE-943] - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic
* https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2013-A1-Injection[OWASP Top Ten 2013 Category A1] - Injection
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]