2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
== Why is this an issue?
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
Java 8 introduced ``++ThreadLocal.withInitial++`` which is a simpler alternative to creating an anonymous inner class to initialise a ``++ThreadLocal++`` instance.
This rule raises an issue when a ``++ThreadLocal++`` anonymous inner class can be replaced by a call to ``++ThreadLocal.withInitial++``.
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Noncompliant code example
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
ThreadLocal<List<String>> myThreadLocal =
new ThreadLocal<List<String>>() { // Noncompliant
@Override
protected List<String> initialValue() {
return new ArrayList<String>();
}
};
----
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Compliant solution
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
ThreadLocal<List<String>> myThreadLocal = ThreadLocal.withInitial(ArrayList::new);
----
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00
=== Message
Replace this anonymous class with a call to "ThreadLocal.withInitial".
=== Highlighting
ThreadLocal instance creation
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]