rspec/rules/S1219/java/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

include::../description.adoc[]

=== Noncompliant code example

[source,java]
----
switch (day) {
  case MONDAY:
  case TUESDAY:
  WEDNESDAY:   // Noncompliant; syntactically correct, but behavior is not what's expected
    doSomething();
    break;
  ...
}

switch (day) {
  case MONDAY:
    break;
  case TUESDAY:
    foo:for(int i = 0 ; i < X ; i++) {  // Noncompliant; the code is correct and behaves as expected but is barely readable 
         /* ... */
        break foo;  // this break statement doesn't relate to the nesting case TUESDAY
         /* ... */
    }
    break;
    /* ... */
}
----


=== Compliant solution

[source,java]
----
switch (day) {
  case MONDAY:
  case TUESDAY:
  case WEDNESDAY:
    doSomething();
    break;
  ...
}

switch (day) {
  case MONDAY:
    break;
  case TUESDAY:
    compute(args); // put the content of the labelled "for" statement in a dedicated method
    break;

    /* ... */
}
----


ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

include::../message.adoc[]

'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]