rspec/rules/S2854/python/comments-and-links.adoc

=== is duplicated by: S2851

=== is duplicated by: S2852

=== on 24 Apr 2015, 09:04:19 Elena Vilchik wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I would replace ``++bug++`` tag with ``++confusing++``. Or at least add it. WDYT?

=== on 28 Apr 2015, 15:36:24 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~elena.vilchik] I've downgraded this from bug to pitfall (meaning it's not broken now but you've left a trap for the next guy)
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is duplicated by: S2851`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is duplicated by: S2852`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 24 Apr 2015, 09:04:19 Elena Vilchik wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			\[~ann.campbell.2] I would replace ``++bug++`` tag with ``++confusing++``. Or at least add it. WDYT?

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 28 Apr 2015, 15:36:24 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~elena.vilchik] I've downgraded this from bug to pitfall (meaning it's not broken now but you've left a trap for the next guy)`