rspec/rules/S2523/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 7 Apr 2015, 23:13:59 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] why this targets C and {cpp}, where we already have implementation of two rules - "NestedComment" and superseeding "S1103"?

=== on 8 Apr 2015, 18:09:36 Ann Campbell wrote:
In fact, [~evgeny.mandrikov], this rule _is_ NestedComment (which the History tab tells me you already knew). Further, this rule is deprecated in favor of RSPEC-1103.


I've entered RULEAPI-208 to handle this cleanup automatically in the future. For now, I'll remove the targeted languages from this ticket.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 7 Apr 2015, 23:13:59 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] why this targets C and {cpp}, where we already have implementation of two rules - "NestedComment" and superseeding "S1103"?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 8 Apr 2015, 18:09:36 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`In fact, [~evgeny.mandrikov], this rule _is_ NestedComment (which the History tab tells me you already knew). Further, this rule is deprecated in favor of RSPEC-1103.`


			`I've entered RULEAPI-208 to handle this cleanup automatically in the future. For now, I'll remove the targeted languages from this ticket.`