2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
== Why is this an issue?
2021-01-27 13:42:22 +01:00
Nested ``++Select Case++`` structures are difficult to understand because you can easily confuse the cases of an inner ``++Select Case++`` as belonging to an outer statement. Therefore nested ``++Select Case++`` statements should be avoided.
2020-12-21 15:38:52 +01:00
2021-02-02 15:02:10 +01:00
2021-01-27 13:42:22 +01:00
Specifically, you should structure your code to avoid the need for nested ``++Select Case++`` statements, but if you cannot, then consider moving the inner ``++Select Case++`` to another function.
2020-12-21 15:38:52 +01:00
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Noncompliant code example
2020-12-21 15:38:52 +01:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,vbnet]
2020-12-21 15:38:52 +01:00
----
Public Sub Foo(A As Integer, B As Integer)
Select Case A
Case 0
' ...
Case 1
Select Case B ' Noncompliant; nested Select Case
Case 2
' ...
Case 3
' ...
Case 4
' ...
Case Else
' ...
End Select
Case 2
' ...
Case Else
' ...
End Select
End Sub
----
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Compliant solution
2020-12-21 15:38:52 +01:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,vbnet]
2020-12-21 15:38:52 +01:00
----
Public Sub Foo(A As Integer, B As Integer)
Select Case A
Case 0
' ...
Case 1
HandleB(B)
Case 2
' ...
Case Else
' ...
End Select
End Sub
----
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00
=== Message
Refactor the code to eliminate this nested 'Select Case'.
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
2021-06-08 15:52:13 +02:00
'''
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]