2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
== Why is this an issue?
2023-06-06 15:02:30 +02:00
``++switch++`` can contain a ``++default++`` clause for various reasons: to handle unexpected values, to show that all the cases were properly considered, etc.
2021-02-02 15:02:10 +01:00
2023-06-06 15:02:30 +02:00
For readability purposes, to help a developer quickly spot the default behavior of a ``++switch++`` statement, it is recommended to put the ``++default++`` clause at the end of the ``++switch++`` statement.
2020-06-30 12:49:37 +02:00
2023-06-06 15:02:30 +02:00
This rule raises an issue if the ``++default++`` clause is not the last one of the ``++switch++``'s cases.
2020-06-30 12:49:37 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2020-06-30 12:49:37 +02:00
----
switch (param) {
case 0:
doSomething();
break;
2023-06-06 15:02:30 +02:00
default: // Noncompliant: default clause should be the last one
2020-06-30 12:49:37 +02:00
error();
break;
case 1:
doSomethingElse();
break;
}
----
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00
=== Message
Move this "default" clause to the end of this "switch" statement.
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
2021-06-08 15:52:13 +02:00
'''
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]