rspec/rules/S3064/java/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 15 Jun 2015, 18:07:41 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~tamas.vajk] I've targeted this to C# because I think it might be relevant.

=== on 17 Aug 2015, 06:56:13 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] This seems very specific (to Java), I wouldn't target C#. There might be minor differences in the Java and C# memory model when using ``++volatile++``, which I'm not aware of.

=== on 17 Aug 2015, 16:08:28 Ann Campbell wrote:
Thanks for the review [~tamas.vajk]. Un-targeted.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 15 Jun 2015, 18:07:41 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~tamas.vajk] I've targeted this to C# because I think it might be relevant.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 17 Aug 2015, 06:56:13 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			\[~ann.campbell.2] This seems very specific (to Java), I wouldn't target C#. There might be minor differences in the Java and C# memory model when using ``++volatile++``, which I'm not aware of.

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 17 Aug 2015, 16:08:28 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Thanks for the review [~tamas.vajk]. Un-targeted.`