rspec/rules/S5863/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 17 Nov 2020, 16:15:30 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:
Note that this rule is a bit more generic for dynamically typed languages. In Java calling ``++assertThat(x).isInstanceOf(x)++`` is likely to fail because ``++isInstanceOf++`` wants a ``++Class++`` as parameter. For languages like PHP or Javascript it is possible to make such a typo. If the test is skipped the issue will go undetected.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 17 Nov 2020, 16:15:30 Nicolas Harraudeau wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			Note that this rule is a bit more generic for dynamically typed languages. In Java calling ``++assertThat(x).isInstanceOf(x)++`` is likely to fail because ``++isInstanceOf++`` wants a ``++Class++`` as parameter. For languages like PHP or Javascript it is possible to make such a typo. If the test is skipped the issue will go undetected.