rspec/rules/S3075/comments-and-links.adoc

=== is related to: S3063

=== on 28 Jul 2015, 07:54:54 Nicolas Peru wrote:
 this rule is redundant with RSPEC-1848 which should be extended with this case rather than creating a new rule.

=== on 14 Aug 2015, 12:14:46 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] please create a POC of merging this with RPSEC-1848 to make sure it doesn't create too many FP's
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is related to: S3063`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 28 Jul 2015, 07:54:54 Nicolas Peru wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`this rule is redundant with RSPEC-1848 which should be extended with this case rather than creating a new rule.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 14 Aug 2015, 12:14:46 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~nicolas.peru] please create a POC of merging this with RPSEC-1848 to make sure it doesn't create too many FP's`