rspec/rules/S3466/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 10 Dec 2015, 18:15:57 Ann Campbell wrote:
While writing this rule [~tamas.vajk] I realized why you'd want to raise an issue on all such calls, not just ones where the override default was different.


And because of that reason, I've made this a 'bug', but I can see an argument for downgrading to 'suspicious'.

=== on 11 Dec 2015, 09:18:45 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Thanks, makes sense.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 10 Dec 2015, 18:15:57 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`While writing this rule [~tamas.vajk] I realized why you'd want to raise an issue on all such calls, not just ones where the override default was different.`


			`And because of that reason, I've made this a 'bug', but I can see an argument for downgrading to 'suspicious'.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 11 Dec 2015, 09:18:45 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] Thanks, makes sense.`