rspec/rules/S2474/plsql/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 28 Jan 2015, 20:43:43 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~dinesh.bolkensteyn] this rule description was copied from Nemo & I don't understand why ``++<<myBlockLabel2>>++`` is labeled noncompliant. Can you verify for me that it is, please?

=== on 11 May 2015, 11:48:47 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:
You're right [~ann.campbell.2] - it actually is compliant. I've updated the description.


Note that there is another rule that verifies that, whenever there is a starting label, there also is a corresponding ending one.

=== on 11 May 2015, 13:50:55 Ann Campbell wrote:
corresponding Compliant Solution added
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 28 Jan 2015, 20:43:43 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			\[~dinesh.bolkensteyn] this rule description was copied from Nemo & I don't understand why ``++<<myBlockLabel2>>++`` is labeled noncompliant. Can you verify for me that it is, please?

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 11 May 2015, 11:48:47 Dinesh Bolkensteyn wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`You're right [~ann.campbell.2] - it actually is compliant. I've updated the description.`


			`Note that there is another rule that verifies that, whenever there is a starting label, there also is a corresponding ending one.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 11 May 2015, 13:50:55 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`corresponding Compliant Solution added`