2021-01-27 13:42:22 +01:00
An ``++except++`` clause that only rethrows the caught exception has the same effect as omitting the ``++except++`` altogether and letting it bubble up automatically, but with more code and the additional detriment of leaving maintainers scratching their heads.
2020-06-30 12:48:07 +02:00
2021-02-02 15:02:10 +01:00
2020-06-30 12:48:07 +02:00
Such clauses should either be eliminated or populated with the appropriate logic.
== Noncompliant Code Example
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,python]
2020-06-30 12:48:07 +02:00
----
a = {}
try:
a[5]
except KeyError:
raise # Noncompliant
----
== Compliant Solution
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,python]
2020-06-30 12:48:07 +02:00
----
a = {}
try:
a[5]
except KeyError as e:
logging.exception('error while accessing the dict')
raise e
----
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
include::../message.adoc[]
2021-06-08 15:52:13 +02:00
'''
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]