rspec/rules/S3050/java/comments-and-links.adoc

=== is related to: S1186

=== on 11 Jun 2015, 20:07:31 Ann Campbell wrote:
CodePro: Enforce Singleton Property with Private Constructor

=== on 16 Jun 2015, 13:19:32 Nicolas Peru wrote:
Looks good.

=== on 13 Apr 2017, 21:10:24 Ann Campbell wrote:
We'll probably want to add an exception to the RSPEC-1186 implementation once this rule is implemented
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is related to: S1186`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 11 Jun 2015, 20:07:31 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`CodePro: Enforce Singleton Property with Private Constructor`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 16 Jun 2015, 13:19:32 Nicolas Peru wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Looks good.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 13 Apr 2017, 21:10:24 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`We'll probably want to add an exception to the RSPEC-1186 implementation once this rule is implemented`