rspec/rules/S3626/comments-and-links.adoc

=== is related to: S1751

=== is related to: S3031

=== on 2 Jun 2016, 13:47:53 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I drafted the rule, let me know what you think.

=== on 2 Jun 2016, 14:05:07 Ann Campbell wrote:
Note that there is a potential overlap of this rule with RSPEC-1751: unconditional ``++continue++`` at the end of a loop.

=== on 2 Jun 2016, 14:05:22 Ann Campbell wrote:
looks fine [~tamas.vajk]
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is related to: S1751`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== is related to: S3031`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 2 Jun 2016, 13:47:53 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] I drafted the rule, let me know what you think.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 2 Jun 2016, 14:05:07 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			Note that there is a potential overlap of this rule with RSPEC-1751: unconditional ``++continue++`` at the end of a loop.

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 2 Jun 2016, 14:05:22 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`looks fine [~tamas.vajk]`