2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
== Why is this an issue?
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
By contract, the ``++NullCipher++`` class provides an "identity cipher" - one that does not transform or encrypt the plaintext in any way. As a consequence, the ciphertext is identical to the plaintext. So this class should be used for testing, and never in production code.
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Noncompliant code example
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
NullCipher nc = new NullCipher();
----
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
== Resources
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-07-08 13:58:56 +02:00
* https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/2017/A6_2017-Security_Misconfiguration[OWASP Top 10 2017 Category A6] - Security Misconfiguration
2022-04-07 08:53:59 -05:00
* https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/327[MITRE, CWE-327] - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
* https://www.sans.org/top25-software-errors/#cat3[SANS Top 25] - Porous Defenses
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00
=== Message
Remove this use of the "NullCipher" class.
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
2021-06-08 15:52:13 +02:00
'''
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00
=== on 3 Dec 2014, 16:05:08 Nicolas Peru wrote:
As discussed, detecting call to constructor(s) is sufficient.
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]