rspec/rules/S2258/java/rule.adoc

40 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

== Why is this an issue?
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
By contract, the ``++NullCipher++`` class provides an "identity cipher" - one that does not transform or encrypt the plaintext in any way. As a consequence, the ciphertext is identical to the plaintext. So this class should be used for testing, and never in production code.
=== Noncompliant code example
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,java]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
NullCipher nc = new NullCipher();
----
== Resources
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
* https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/2017/A6_2017-Security_Misconfiguration[OWASP Top 10 2017 Category A6] - Security Misconfiguration
* https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/327[MITRE, CWE-327] - Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
* https://www.sans.org/top25-software-errors/#cat3[SANS Top 25] - Porous Defenses
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Remove this use of the "NullCipher" class.
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
=== on 3 Dec 2014, 16:05:08 Nicolas Peru wrote:
As discussed, detecting call to constructor(s) is sufficient.
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]