2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
== Why is this an issue?
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
An Open SQL ``++SELECT++`` statement without an explicit ``++ORDER BY++`` clause will retrieve rows in an unpredictable order. On pool/cluster tables, the current implementation of Open SQL ``++SELECT++`` returns the result set in the primary key order, but that's not the case for transparent tables. That's why it's safer to always use an ``++ORDER BY++`` clause.
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Noncompliant code example
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,abap]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
OPEN CURSOR C FOR SELECT * FROM SBOOK WHERE CARRID = 'LH '. "NonCompliant
SELECT * FROM FLIGHTS WHERE FLIGHT_NUMBER = 'LH '."NonCompliant
----
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2023-05-03 11:06:20 +02:00
=== Compliant solution
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,abap]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
OPEN CURSOR C FOR SELECT * FROM SBOOK WHERE CARRID = 'LH '
ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY.
SELECT * FROM FLIGHTS WHERE FLIGHT_NUMBER = 'LH ' ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY.
----
2021-04-28 18:08:03 +02:00
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00
=== Message
Add an "ORDER BY" clause to this SQL "SELECT" statement.
2021-09-20 15:38:42 +02:00
2021-06-08 15:52:13 +02:00
'''
2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
2023-05-25 14:18:12 +02:00
=== relates to: S1592
=== relates to: S3270
=== on 2 Dec 2014, 14:41:56 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~freddy.mallet] no code samples?
=== on 4 Dec 2014, 09:44:24 Freddy Mallet wrote:
Done [~ann.campbell.2]!
2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]