rspec/rules/S1668/abap/rule.adoc

55 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

== Why is this an issue?
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
The main reason for using chained statements is to increase readability, but when used with operational statements, chaining can have the opposite effect. Even worse, it can lead to unexpected program behavior.
=== Noncompliant code example
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,abap]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
TRY.
...
CATCH: cx_1, cx_2, cx_3. " only cx_3 gets the following CATCH block
"exception handling
...
ENDTRY.
----
=== Compliant solution
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
2022-02-04 17:28:24 +01:00
[source,abap]
2021-04-28 16:49:39 +02:00
----
TRY.
...
CATCH cx_1.
"exception handling
CATCH cx_2.
"exception handling
CATCH cx_3.
"exception handling
...
ENDTRY.
----
ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]
'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)
=== Message
Write each of these n statements separately
'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)
=== on 2 Apr 2014, 20:28:34 Ann Campbell wrote:
@Freddy, I don't really understand the distinction between logic-related and instruction-related reliability
endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]