rspec/rules/S999/comments-and-links.adoc

=== relates to: S1064

=== on 6 Apr 2015, 14:14:14 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I'm wondering if SQALE is missing on purpose or not?

=== on 13 Apr 2015, 19:31:57 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I'm wondering why blocker, but not active by default? Note that in implementation currently major and active.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== relates to: S1064`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 6 Apr 2015, 14:14:14 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] I'm wondering if SQALE is missing on purpose or not?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 13 Apr 2015, 19:31:57 Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] I'm wondering why blocker, but not active by default? Note that in implementation currently major and active.`