rspec/rules/S2260/csharp/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 6 Oct 2015, 12:16:13 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] This rule talks about {cpp}, but in the title it says C#. This is a copy-paste error. What would be the purpose of this rule?

=== on 6 Oct 2015, 12:21:07 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~tamas.vajk] many of the plugins have the ability to raise "parser failure" issues on files. That makes it easy for users to see which files didn't get analyzed for issues.


Not terribly relevant to SonarLint, but perhaps helpful on the plugin side.

include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 6 Oct 2015, 12:16:13 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] This rule talks about {cpp}, but in the title it says C#. This is a copy-paste error. What would be the purpose of this rule?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 6 Oct 2015, 12:21:07 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~tamas.vajk] many of the plugins have the ability to raise "parser failure" issues on files. That makes it easy for users to see which files didn't get analyzed for issues.`


			`Not terribly relevant to SonarLint, but perhaps helpful on the plugin side.`

			`include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]`