rspec/rules/S1764/java/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 1 Oct 2014, 11:39:51 Nicolas Peru wrote:
Sub task for RSPEC-1764 with updated description for Java, please review.

=== on 1 Oct 2014, 11:44:49 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] I question retaining this noncompliant example:

----
if (5 / 5) { // always 1
  doV();
}
----

In C, >=1 evaluates to true & 0 evaluates to false. Is it that the same holds true in Java but it's just considered very bad form? If so, then why eliminate this one:

----
if (5 - 5) { // always 0
  do_u();
}
----
?


Also, we have a different rule that yells at people for using equality operators with floating-point numbers, so the first exception is doubly confusing

include::../comments-and-links.adoc[]