rspec/rules/S3216/csharp/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 1 Jul 2015, 15:40:18 Ann Campbell wrote:
Note [~tamas.vajk] that because I anticipate FP's from this rule, I've turned it on in the Security profile but not in SonarQube Way. Unless you're good enough to tell if execution _must_ pick back up in the main thread & ignore those instances?

=== on 2 Jul 2015, 07:02:20 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Thanks, it looks good. We'll see the FPs: we can automatically exclude "exe" projects, ...

=== on 21 Aug 2015, 06:18:04 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] Do you think this is a security issue as well?

=== on 21 Aug 2015, 12:24:45 Ann Campbell wrote:
\[~tamas.vajk] I'm kinda in a bind: Critical rules must be bugs or security-related. Since multi-threading issues can affect security, I added the security tag rather than downgrading the severity.

=== on 21 Aug 2015, 12:28:28 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~ann.campbell.2] I see. It's more like a bug rule, but it is just a potential bug, so maybe we should reduce the severity to major.

=== on 21 Aug 2015, 12:50:53 Ann Campbell wrote:
Done [~tamas.vajk]
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 1 Jul 2015, 15:40:18 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Note [~tamas.vajk] that because I anticipate FP's from this rule, I've turned it on in the Security profile but not in SonarQube Way. Unless you're good enough to tell if execution _must_ pick back up in the main thread & ignore those instances?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 2 Jul 2015, 07:02:20 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] Thanks, it looks good. We'll see the FPs: we can automatically exclude "exe" projects, ...`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 21 Aug 2015, 06:18:04 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] Do you think this is a security issue as well?`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 21 Aug 2015, 12:24:45 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~tamas.vajk] I'm kinda in a bind: Critical rules must be bugs or security-related. Since multi-threading issues can affect security, I added the security tag rather than downgrading the severity.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 21 Aug 2015, 12:28:28 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~ann.campbell.2] I see. It's more like a bug rule, but it is just a potential bug, so maybe we should reduce the severity to major.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 21 Aug 2015, 12:50:53 Ann Campbell wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`Done [~tamas.vajk]`