rspec/rules/S3281/xml/rule.adoc

== Why is this an issue?

Default interceptors, such as application security interceptors, must be listed in the ``++ejb-jar.xml++`` file, or they will not be treated as default.


This rule applies to projects that contain JEE Beans (any one of ``++javax.ejb.Singleton++``, ``++MessageDriven++``, ``++Stateless++`` or ``++Stateful++``).


=== Noncompliant code example

[source,xml]
----
// file: ejb-interceptors.xml
<assembly-descriptor>
 <interceptor-binding> <!-- should be declared in ejb-jar.xml -->
      <ejb-name>*</ejb-name>
      <interceptor-class>com.myco.ImportantInterceptor</interceptor-class> <!-- Noncompliant; will NOT be treated as default -->
   </interceptor-binding>
</assembly-descriptor>
----


=== Compliant solution

[source,xml]
----
// file: ejb-jar.xml
<assembly-descriptor>
 <interceptor-binding>
      <ejb-name>*</ejb-name>
      <interceptor-class>com.myco.ImportantInterceptor</interceptor-class>
   </interceptor-binding>
</assembly-descriptor>
----


== Resources

* https://owasp.org/Top10/A05_2021-Security_Misconfiguration/[OWASP Top 10 2021 Category A5] - Security Misconfiguration
* https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/2017/A6_2017-Security_Misconfiguration[OWASP Top 10 2017 Category A6] - Security Misconfiguration


ifdef::env-github,rspecator-view[]

'''
== Implementation Specification
(visible only on this page)

=== Message

Move this default interceptor to "ejb-jar.xml"


'''
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

=== on 23 Jul 2015, 13:02:01 Ann Campbell wrote:
Rule origin: \https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sonarqube/cYQdBhf00eo


Project is EJB if it contains JEE Beans (any one of javax.ejb.Singleton, MessageDriven, Stateless or Stateful) (@Local/@Remote interfaces are not mandatory)




=== on 30 Jul 2015, 13:04:52 Nicolas Peru wrote:
Your comment should probably be part of the rule description. Otherwise looks good.

=== on 30 Jul 2015, 14:01:39 Ann Campbell wrote:
done [~nicolas.peru]

=== on 19 Mar 2018, 09:54:11 Sébastien GIORIA - AppSecFR wrote:
Could be tagged  OWASP A6:2017

=== on 20 Mar 2018, 07:24:20 Freddy Mallet wrote:
Done [~SPoint], thanks !

endif::env-github,rspecator-view[]