rspec/rules/S2225/comments-and-links.adoc

=== on 21 Nov 2014, 14:41:20 Freddy Mallet wrote:
My 2 cents [~ann.campbell.2]:

* I would also tag this rule with label "bug"
* I would associate this rule to category "Reliability - Instruction related Reliability"

=== on 25 Nov 2014, 10:09:37 Freddy Mallet wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] and [~pierre-yves.nicolas], for me here there is no need (at least for a first valuable implementation) to have the CFG. Indeed, as soon as there is a statement "return null;" in the body of a toString() method, this is enough to raise an issue without generating any false-positives.

=== on 5 Dec 2016, 14:20:47 Tamas Vajk wrote:
\[~nicolas.peru] The code sample here doesn't look like Java code.
Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 21 Nov 2014, 14:41:20 Freddy Mallet wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`My 2 cents [~ann.campbell.2]:`

			`* I would also tag this rule with label "bug"`
			`* I would associate this rule to category "Reliability - Instruction related Reliability"`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 25 Nov 2014, 10:09:37 Freddy Mallet wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~nicolas.peru] and [~pierre-yves.nicolas], for me here there is no need (at least for a first valuable implementation) to have the CFG. Indeed, as soon as there is a statement "return null;" in the body of a toString() method, this is enough to raise an issue without generating any false-positives.`

Fix the comment display: rule-id, timestamp, GH visibility, link direction 2021-06-03 09:05:38 +02:00			`=== on 5 Dec 2016, 14:20:47 Tamas Vajk wrote:`
Export comments and rspec-to-rspec links from jira 2021-06-02 20:44:38 +02:00			`\[~nicolas.peru] The code sample here doesn't look like Java code.`