19 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
19 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
|
=== On 2015-04-08T09:28:51Z Elena Vilchik Wrote:
|
||
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] I fixed description a little bit. Could you validate that?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
=== On 2015-04-08T18:32:12Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
|
||
|
|
\[~elena.vilchik] w3schools.com lists both of those as reserved words. That makes me wonder why we have a rule that covers only those 2 reserved words and not all of them...?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
=== On 2015-04-09T07:12:59Z Elena Vilchik Wrote:
|
||
|
|
\[~ann.campbell.2] I'm not sure, may be [~linda.martin] has more information. I've found this info \https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-identifiers-static-semantics-early-errors
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
=== On 2015-04-09T11:43:40Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
|
||
|
|
I'm assigning this to [~linda.martin] so she can weigh-in on the discussion
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
=== On 2015-05-19T15:49:16Z Linda Martin Wrote:
|
||
|
|
Sorry for the late reply. "arguments" and "eval" are not reserved word it is a syntax error (in normal mode) to assign or defined a variable with a reserved word as the identifier. So IMHO it would not make sens to check for reserved words.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
=== On 2015-05-19T19:11:13Z Ann Campbell Wrote:
|
||
|
|
okay, I think we're good then [~elena.vilchik] (cc [~linda.martin])
|
||
|
|
|