rspec/rules/S1697/javascript/rule.adoc

When either the equality operator in a test for ``++null++`` or ``++undefined++``, or the logical operator that follows it is reversed, the code has the appearance of safely null-testing the object before dereferencing it. Unfortunately the effect is just the opposite - the object is null-tested and then dereferenced only if it is ``++null++``/``++undefined++``, leading to a guaranteed ``++TypeError++``.

== Noncompliant Code Example

----
if (str == null && str.length == 0) {
  console.log("String is empty");
}

if (str == undefined && str.length == 0) {
  console.log("String is empty");
}

if (str != null || str.length > 0) {
  console.log("String is not empty");
}

if (str != undefined || str.length > 0) {
  console.log("String is not empty");
}
----

== Compliant Solution

----
if (str != null && str.length == 0) {
  console.log("String is empty");
}

if (str != undefined && str.length == 0) {
  console.log("String is empty");
}

if (str == null || str.length > 0) {
  console.log("String is not empty");
}

if (str == undefined || str.length > 0) {
  console.log("String is not empty");
}
----

ifdef::rspecator-view[]
== Comments And Links
(visible only on this page)

include::comments-and-links.adoc[]
endif::rspecator-view[]